Difference between revisions of "Lovesick"
(→Note) |
(→Effects) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
==Effects== | ==Effects== | ||
| − | *Adds [[Charm]] and beauty abilities to | + | *Adds [[Charm]] and beauty abilities to one random stack if on-color. Beauty only for non-color casters. |
==Note== | ==Note== | ||
Revision as of 18:41, 11 September 2007
Rank: Complex
Type: Instant/Battle
Cost: 8,000 MP
Effects
- Adds Charm and beauty abilities to one random stack if on-color. Beauty only for non-color casters.
Note
Feet of hermes is more powerful in defense with a mono stack than this
MikeClough: I don't agree with this. Charm means attacks are 50% as effective (and counters). Swift gives your enemy -10 accuracy, or an average of -33.3% damage, vs charm with -50%. Also, alot of the units you would use for a blue mono stack already have swift. There would be some conditions where swift is better, for example, if you were trying to reduce enemy accuracy beyond 0.
Pi: Charm does not work against extra attacks, so Feet of Hermes is more reliable than Lovesick in a sense. And since units with powerful extra attacks (Red Dragons, Chimeras, Mind Rippers, Phoenixes, etc.) are encountered often, Feet of Hermes is generally more effective too.
MikeClough: Agreed. Feet of Hermes is better than Lovesick when dealing with units that have a powerful secondary attack, compared to their primary attack.
Psy: But is Feet of Hermes only for one stack?...
AstraLDeVa: somone got the description wrong - Lovesick is 1 random group also. Thus this spell and Feet of hermes are calculated on solo stacking only
