Talk:Lovesick

From TheReincarnation
Revision as of 22:00, 17 March 2008 by Groentje (talk | contribs) (New page: == Feet of Hermes vs. Lovesick == Note: Feet of Hermes is a now retired spell! ==Note== Feet of hermes is more powerful in defense with a mono stack than this MikeClough: I don't ag...)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

Feet of Hermes vs. Lovesick

Note: Feet of Hermes is a now retired spell!

Note

Feet of hermes is more powerful in defense with a mono stack than this

MikeClough: I don't agree with this. Charm means attacks are 50% as effective (and counters). Swift gives your enemy -10 accuracy, or an average of -33.3% damage, vs charm with -50%. Also, alot of the units you would use for a blue mono stack already have swift. There would be some conditions where swift is better, for example, if you were trying to reduce enemy accuracy beyond 0.

Pi: Charm does not work against extra attacks, so Feet of Hermes is more reliable than Lovesick in a sense. And since units with powerful extra attacks (Red Dragons, Chimeras, Mind Rippers, Phoenixes, etc.) are encountered often, Feet of Hermes is generally more effective too.

MikeClough: Agreed. Feet of Hermes is better than Lovesick when dealing with units that have a powerful secondary attack, compared to their primary attack.

Psy: But is Feet of Hermes only for one stack?...

AstraLDeVa: somone got the description wrong - Lovesick is 1 random group also. Thus this spell and Feet of hermes are calculated on solo stacking only