Difference between revisions of "User talk:Slurpz"
m |
m |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
::--[[User:Groentje|Groentje]] 22:51, 2 March 2008 (CET) | ::--[[User:Groentje|Groentje]] 22:51, 2 March 2008 (CET) | ||
::: On not being able to create a new account at wiki: | ::: On not being able to create a new account at wiki: | ||
| − | ::: That is correct: You need to have an account at UBB, and | + | ::: That is correct: You need to have an account at UBB, and then that is your account when you login to wiki too. |
| − | ::: [[User:Groentje|Groentje]] 11:45, 9 March 2008 (CET) | + | ::: --[[User:Groentje|Groentje]] 11:45, 9 March 2008 (CET) |
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | |||
| + | Check out my suggestions here. <br> | ||
| + | [[User_talk:Windflare#Wiki_Suggestions]]<br> | ||
| + | [[User:Windflare|Windflare]] 02:25, 21 April 2008 (CEST) | ||
Latest revision as of 21:52, 21 April 2008
go go wiki spreeing Slurpz !
--Groentje 22:40, 15 January 2008 (CET)
Grammar Nitpicking? :p
Be careful with the deletion stuff; the werewolves one was a redirect page.
--Sammael 10:56, 15 February 2008 (CET)
re: spam reduction suggestion
Oh I've suggested that to the devs before (quite a long time before methinks). Seems to be in the back burner as of now.
--Sammael 03:48, 28 February 2008 (CET)
On spam: yes. account approving will counter spam. I know. But devs have another plan: integrate wiki with portal access. Will bug them on urgency again.
--Groentje 09:26, 29 February 2008 (CET)
Check out my suggestions here.
User_talk:Windflare#Wiki_Suggestions
Windflare 02:25, 21 April 2008 (CEST)
