Difference between revisions of "User talk:Slurpz"
m |
m |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
Oh I've suggested that to the devs before (quite a long time before methinks). Seems to be in the back burner as of now. | Oh I've suggested that to the devs before (quite a long time before methinks). Seems to be in the back burner as of now. | ||
--[[User:Sammael|Sammael]] 03:48, 28 February 2008 (CET) | --[[User:Sammael|Sammael]] 03:48, 28 February 2008 (CET) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | On spam: yes. account approving will counter spam. I know. | ||
| + | But devs have another plan: integrate wiki with portal access. Will bug them on urgency again. [[User:Groentje|Groentje]] 09:26, 29 February 2008 (CET) | ||
Revision as of 08:26, 29 February 2008
go go wiki spreeing Slurpz !
--Groentje 22:40, 15 January 2008 (CET)
Grammar Nitpicking? :p
Be careful with the deletion stuff; the werewolves one was a redirect page.
--Sammael 10:56, 15 February 2008 (CET)
re: spam reduction suggestion
Oh I've suggested that to the devs before (quite a long time before methinks). Seems to be in the back burner as of now. --Sammael 03:48, 28 February 2008 (CET)
On spam: yes. account approving will counter spam. I know. But devs have another plan: integrate wiki with portal access. Will bug them on urgency again. Groentje 09:26, 29 February 2008 (CET)
