Difference between revisions of "Damage Formula"
Machiavelli (talk | contribs) (→Damage-Soaking Formula) |
Machiavelli (talk | contribs) (→Damage-Soaking Formula) |
||
| (12 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
*'''UnitR''' is the unit receiving the attack | *'''UnitR''' is the unit receiving the attack | ||
*'''UnitA_attack_power''' may be modified by valor, berserk, battle spells, battle items, etc. | *'''UnitA_attack_power''' may be modified by valor, berserk, battle spells, battle items, etc. | ||
| − | *'''accuracy''' is Unit A's accuracy in attacking UnitR; base [[accuracy]] is 0.3 on defense and regular attacks and 0.2 on sieges, but often modified by [[Sun]] favor, accuracy-related unit abilities (fear, swift, beauty, marksmanship, clumsiness), enchantments, battle spells, heroes, etc. | + | *'''accuracy''' is Unit A's accuracy in attacking UnitR; base [[accuracy]] is 0.3 on defense and regular attacks and 0.2 on sieges, but often modified by [[Sun]] favor, accuracy-related unit abilities (fear, swift, beauty, marksmanship, clumsiness), enchantments, battle spells, heroes, etc.; all of these factors are added and subtracted together |
*'''UnitA_damage_modifier''' is typically a random number between 0.2 and 0.8, but the average of 0.5 is usually used | *'''UnitA_damage_modifier''' is typically a random number between 0.2 and 0.8, but the average of 0.5 is usually used | ||
*'''UnitR_resistance''' is the resistance of UnitR to the [[Attack Type|attack type]] of UnitA's attack; if there is more than one attack type (e.g. FIRE BREATH), the average of these attack types is used; often modified by battle spells, items, hero abilities (mind shield, ice shield, unholy aura), enchantments (Black Sabbath), and uniques | *'''UnitR_resistance''' is the resistance of UnitR to the [[Attack Type|attack type]] of UnitA's attack; if there is more than one attack type (e.g. FIRE BREATH), the average of these attack types is used; often modified by battle spells, items, hero abilities (mind shield, ice shield, unholy aura), enchantments (Black Sabbath), and uniques | ||
| − | *'''UnitR_Defensive_Abilities''' would be non-accuracy-related unit abilities like [[Healing_(Unit_Ability)|healing]] (0.7), [[scales]] (0.75), [[regeneration]] (0.8), [[charm]] (0.5), [[large shield]] (0.5), [[Weakness_To_Attacktype|weakness]] (2.0), etc., which would all be multiplied together | + | *'''UnitR_Defensive_Abilities''' would be non-accuracy-related unit abilities like [[Healing_(Unit_Ability)|healing]] (0.7), [[scales]] (0.75), [[regeneration]] (0.8), [[charm]] (0.5 if the attack is a primary attack), [[large shield]] (0.5 if UnitA's attack is ranged), [[Weakness_To_Attacktype|weakness]] (2.0 if the attack contains the attack type matching the weakness), etc., which would all be multiplied together |
===Alternate Version of Damage Formula=== | ===Alternate Version of Damage Formula=== | ||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
Using the damage formula, you can know how damage is calculated and therefore determine the easiest ways to increase it. | Using the damage formula, you can know how damage is calculated and therefore determine the easiest ways to increase it. | ||
| − | For example, the damage formula will demonstrate that getting a level 17 warlord, which will increase your damage on a siege by roughly 16% (assuming Sun favor and that some of your units won't suffer the siege attack's 10% accuracy penalty), is far better than getting a level 17 veteran whose level 9 valor increases damage by only 12% on primary attacks (if | + | For example, the damage formula will demonstrate that getting a level 17 warlord, which will increase your damage on a siege by roughly 16% (assuming Sun favor and that some of your units won't suffer the siege attack's 10% accuracy penalty), is far better than getting a level 17 veteran whose level 9 valor increases damage by only 12% on primary attacks (if even that; see, for example, [[Plant_growth#Usage_Tip]]) and not at all on secondary attacks. (See: [[Valor_versus_Tactics|Valor vs. Tactics]].) This formula will also demonstrate that Sun favor's 3% accuracy is also slightly superior to Lucifer favor's 10% AP increase. |
Perhaps most importantly, this formula will allow you to decide what battle spells and items you should be using. For example, using candle against 90% melee-resistant Titans will increase the damage done to them by Treant by 100%, whereas using Potion of Valor would produce much less significant gains. The same sorts of comparisons can be used when a green is deciding between using Rust Armor, Sword of Light, Flame Blade, or Eye of the Eagle, when a nether is deciding between Foul Water, Battle Lust, or Flame Blade, or when a Phantasm mage is deciding between Double Time or Sleep. | Perhaps most importantly, this formula will allow you to decide what battle spells and items you should be using. For example, using candle against 90% melee-resistant Titans will increase the damage done to them by Treant by 100%, whereas using Potion of Valor would produce much less significant gains. The same sorts of comparisons can be used when a green is deciding between using Rust Armor, Sword of Light, Flame Blade, or Eye of the Eagle, when a nether is deciding between Foul Water, Battle Lust, or Flame Blade, or when a Phantasm mage is deciding between Double Time or Sleep. | ||
| Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
=Damage-Soaking Formula= | =Damage-Soaking Formula= | ||
'''UnitR_Soaking_Ability = UnitR_hitpoints / (accuracy * (1 - (UnitR_resistance/100)) * UnitR_defensive_abilities * UnitR_netpower) | '''UnitR_Soaking_Ability = UnitR_hitpoints / (accuracy * (1 - (UnitR_resistance/100)) * UnitR_defensive_abilities * UnitR_netpower) | ||
| + | *'''UnitR_defensive_abilities''' -- although it may seem counter-intuitive, this factor is on the bottom so that we can use the exact same coefficients as above, e.g. 0.5 for large shield (if UnitA's attack is ranged), 0.7 for healing, 2.0 for weakness, etc.; keep in mind that dividing by 0.5, like in the case of large shield or charm, is the same as multiplying the numerator (hitpoints) by 2 | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
Using the equation above, which might be called the '''''Damage-Soaking Formula''''', you can calculate how well certain units are at defending against various attacks. | Using the equation above, which might be called the '''''Damage-Soaking Formula''''', you can calculate how well certain units are at defending against various attacks. | ||
| − | For example, if you were an Ascendant mage attacking an verdant mage who was known to be using a heavy | + | For example, if you were an Ascendant mage attacking an verdant mage who was known to be using a heavy High Elves top with an eye+candle (+10% accuracy for HE, -10% resistances for attacker) defensive assignment, you'll have to decide between using an AA, unicorn, KT, dominion, djinni, or treant top, at which point you could compare their ability to take damage from the HE, which we'll assume to also have a 7% accuracy boost from Nature's Lore and a 3% boost from Sun favor. |
| Line 58: | Line 61: | ||
'''Dominion Ranged-Lightning Soaking Ability''' = 80000 / (0.45 * 0.25 * 0.7 * 39013) = 26.04<br> | '''Dominion Ranged-Lightning Soaking Ability''' = 80000 / (0.45 * 0.25 * 0.7 * 39013) = 26.04<br> | ||
'''Djinni Ranged-Lightning Soaking Ability''' = 7650 / (0.5 * 0.175 * 1 * 1700) = 51.43<br> | '''Djinni Ranged-Lightning Soaking Ability''' = 7650 / (0.5 * 0.175 * 1 * 1700) = 51.43<br> | ||
| − | '''Treant Ranged- | + | '''Treant Ranged-Lightning Soaking Ability''' = 4200 / (0.5 * 0.765 * 1 * 423) = 25.99 |
| − | Dropping the clear losers, we have...<br> | + | Dropping the clear losers, and now weighting them in respect to their the proportions of HE damage output, we have...<br> |
'''Archangel Soaking Ability''' = 28.22 * (13/20.5) + 52.91 * (7.5/20.5) = 37.25<br> | '''Archangel Soaking Ability''' = 28.22 * (13/20.5) + 52.91 * (7.5/20.5) = 37.25<br> | ||
'''Djinni Soaking Ability''' = 21.18 * (13/20.5) + 51.43 * (7.5/20.5) = 32.25<br> | '''Djinni Soaking Ability''' = 21.18 * (13/20.5) + 51.43 * (7.5/20.5) = 32.25<br> | ||
| Line 68: | Line 71: | ||
| − | Usually there will only be 2 or 3 candidates to calculate, and usually the calculations won't be this complicated (lots of accuracy bonuses, candle, two attacks with two attack types each), so | + | Usually there will only be 2 or 3 candidates to calculate, and usually the calculations won't be nearly this complicated (lots of accuracy bonuses, candle, two attacks with two attack types each... yuck!), so this was a pretty ridiculous example. If you don't like this method, you can always use the standard damage formula from above and simply testing how much damage some number of HE (for example, 10,000 HE) would do to various units. That said, treants are the winners here with AA not too far behind, although whether you want to summon Treants, as a white, for this purpose is up to you! |
| + | |||
| + | Tip: When running these calculations, keep in mind that results over 100 should be considered "excellent," results over 65 should be considered "good," and results over 40 should be considered "decent." A result under 30 is quite bad, but it may be inevitable if your opponent is a green using heavy HE + eye/candle, a red using heavy RD/chims + stun/oil, or any other stacking that yields high damage output. | ||
[[Category:Battle Factors]] | [[Category:Battle Factors]] | ||
Latest revision as of 16:15, 6 July 2016
The battle simulator feature is a decent method for inquiring how much damage one unit will do to another, or which units will win in a certain matchup or arrangement, but for the sake of understanding the mechanics of the game and precisely calculating damage dealt from one stack to another, the damage formula is needed.
Contents
Damage Formula
UnitR_Losses = Number_of_UnitA * UnitA_attack_power * (accuracy/100) * UnitA_damage_modifier * UnitA_efficiency * (1 - (UnitR_resistance/100)) * UnitR_defensive_abilities / UnitR_hitpoints
- UnitA is the attacking unit
- UnitR is the unit receiving the attack
- UnitA_attack_power may be modified by valor, berserk, battle spells, battle items, etc.
- accuracy is Unit A's accuracy in attacking UnitR; base accuracy is 0.3 on defense and regular attacks and 0.2 on sieges, but often modified by Sun favor, accuracy-related unit abilities (fear, swift, beauty, marksmanship, clumsiness), enchantments, battle spells, heroes, etc.; all of these factors are added and subtracted together
- UnitA_damage_modifier is typically a random number between 0.2 and 0.8, but the average of 0.5 is usually used
- UnitR_resistance is the resistance of UnitR to the attack type of UnitA's attack; if there is more than one attack type (e.g. FIRE BREATH), the average of these attack types is used; often modified by battle spells, items, hero abilities (mind shield, ice shield, unholy aura), enchantments (Black Sabbath), and uniques
- UnitR_Defensive_Abilities would be non-accuracy-related unit abilities like healing (0.7), scales (0.75), regeneration (0.8), charm (0.5 if the attack is a primary attack), large shield (0.5 if UnitA's attack is ranged), weakness (2.0 if the attack contains the attack type matching the weakness), etc., which would all be multiplied together
Alternate Version of Damage Formula
Alternatively, this calculation can be broken up into intermediate parts...
Attack = Number_of_UnitA * UnitA_attack_power * accuracy * UnitA_damage_modifier * UnitA_efficiency
Defend = UnitR_hitpoints / (1 - (UnitR_resistance/100))
UnitR_Losses = Attack/Defend
Examples
Regular Attack: 245 Water Elemental attacking Vampire
- accuracy modifiers: 30% (standard accuracy in a regular attack) - 10% (swift) = 20%; therefore, accuracy/100 = 0.2
- resistance modifiers: poison (75%), ranged (95%); (1 - (85/100)) = 0.15
Vampire_Losses = 245 * 400,000 * 0.2 * 0.5 * 1.0 * 0.15 * 0.5 / 4500 = 163.3 => 163 dead Vampire
Using the Damage Formula to your benefit
Using the damage formula, you can know how damage is calculated and therefore determine the easiest ways to increase it.
For example, the damage formula will demonstrate that getting a level 17 warlord, which will increase your damage on a siege by roughly 16% (assuming Sun favor and that some of your units won't suffer the siege attack's 10% accuracy penalty), is far better than getting a level 17 veteran whose level 9 valor increases damage by only 12% on primary attacks (if even that; see, for example, Plant_growth#Usage_Tip) and not at all on secondary attacks. (See: Valor vs. Tactics.) This formula will also demonstrate that Sun favor's 3% accuracy is also slightly superior to Lucifer favor's 10% AP increase.
Perhaps most importantly, this formula will allow you to decide what battle spells and items you should be using. For example, using candle against 90% melee-resistant Titans will increase the damage done to them by Treant by 100%, whereas using Potion of Valor would produce much less significant gains. The same sorts of comparisons can be used when a green is deciding between using Rust Armor, Sword of Light, Flame Blade, or Eye of the Eagle, when a nether is deciding between Foul Water, Battle Lust, or Flame Blade, or when a Phantasm mage is deciding between Double Time or Sleep.
Damage-Soaking Formula
UnitR_Soaking_Ability = UnitR_hitpoints / (accuracy * (1 - (UnitR_resistance/100)) * UnitR_defensive_abilities * UnitR_netpower)
- UnitR_defensive_abilities -- although it may seem counter-intuitive, this factor is on the bottom so that we can use the exact same coefficients as above, e.g. 0.5 for large shield (if UnitA's attack is ranged), 0.7 for healing, 2.0 for weakness, etc.; keep in mind that dividing by 0.5, like in the case of large shield or charm, is the same as multiplying the numerator (hitpoints) by 2
Using the equation above, which might be called the Damage-Soaking Formula, you can calculate how well certain units are at defending against various attacks.
For example, if you were an Ascendant mage attacking an verdant mage who was known to be using a heavy High Elves top with an eye+candle (+10% accuracy for HE, -10% resistances for attacker) defensive assignment, you'll have to decide between using an AA, unicorn, KT, dominion, djinni, or treant top, at which point you could compare their ability to take damage from the HE, which we'll assume to also have a 7% accuracy boost from Nature's Lore and a 3% boost from Sun favor.
Unicorn Ranged-Paralyze Soaking Ability = 2500 / (0.35 * 0.65 * 1 * 375) = 29.30
Archangel Ranged-Paralyze Soaking Ability = 5000 / (0.45 * 0.75 * 0.7 * 750) = 28.22
Knight Templar Ranged-Paralyze Soaking Ability = 375 / (0.5 * 0.925 * 0.5 * 60) = 27.03
Dominion Ranged-Paralyze Soaking Ability = 80000 / (0.45 * 0.25 * 0.7 * 39013) = 26.04
Djinni Ranged-Paralyze Soaking Ability = 7650 / (0.5 * 0.425 * 1 * 1700) = 21.18
Treant Ranged-Paralyze Soaking Ability = 4200 / (0.5 * 0.39 * 1 * 423) = 50.92
Unicorn Ranged-Lightning Soaking Ability = 2500 / (0.35 * 0.8 * 1 * 375) = 23.81
Archangel Ranged-Lightning Soaking Ability = 5000 / (0.45 * 0.4 * 0.7 * 750) = 52.91
Knight Templar Ranged-Lightning Soaking Ability = 375 / (0.5 * 0.925 * 0.5 * 60) = 27.03
Dominion Ranged-Lightning Soaking Ability = 80000 / (0.45 * 0.25 * 0.7 * 39013) = 26.04
Djinni Ranged-Lightning Soaking Ability = 7650 / (0.5 * 0.175 * 1 * 1700) = 51.43
Treant Ranged-Lightning Soaking Ability = 4200 / (0.5 * 0.765 * 1 * 423) = 25.99
Dropping the clear losers, and now weighting them in respect to their the proportions of HE damage output, we have...
Archangel Soaking Ability = 28.22 * (13/20.5) + 52.91 * (7.5/20.5) = 37.25
Djinni Soaking Ability = 21.18 * (13/20.5) + 51.43 * (7.5/20.5) = 32.25
Treant Soaking Ability = 50.92 * (13/20.5) + 25.99 * (7.5/20.5) = 41.80
Usually there will only be 2 or 3 candidates to calculate, and usually the calculations won't be nearly this complicated (lots of accuracy bonuses, candle, two attacks with two attack types each... yuck!), so this was a pretty ridiculous example. If you don't like this method, you can always use the standard damage formula from above and simply testing how much damage some number of HE (for example, 10,000 HE) would do to various units. That said, treants are the winners here with AA not too far behind, although whether you want to summon Treants, as a white, for this purpose is up to you!
Tip: When running these calculations, keep in mind that results over 100 should be considered "excellent," results over 65 should be considered "good," and results over 40 should be considered "decent." A result under 30 is quite bad, but it may be inevitable if your opponent is a green using heavy HE + eye/candle, a red using heavy RD/chims + stun/oil, or any other stacking that yields high damage output.
