Difference between revisions of "Lovesick"

From TheReincarnation
Jump to: navigation, search
(Effects)
m
Line 1: Line 1:
<center>[[Encyclopedia]] | [[Units]] | <font size=3>'''[[Spells]]'''</font> </center>
+
{{Spellnav}}
  
Rank: Complex<br>
+
Rank: {{blue}} Complex<br>
 
Type: Instant/Battle<br>
 
Type: Instant/Battle<br>
 
Cost: 8,000 MP<br>
 
Cost: 8,000 MP<br>

Revision as of 21:58, 17 March 2008

Encyclopedia | Units | Spells | Items | Heroes | Skills | Buildings | Guides
Icon ERADICATION.gif Eradication | Icon VERDANT.gif Verdant | Icon ASCENDANT.gif Ascendant | Icon PHANTASM.gif Phantasm | Icon NETHER.gif Nether | Icon PLAIN.gif Plain

| Spell Attributes | Lists of Simple, Average, Complex, Ultimate & Ancient Spells |


Rank: Icon PHANTASM.gif Complex
Type: Instant/Battle
Cost: 8,000 MP


Effects

  • Adds Charm and beauty abilities to one random stack if on-color. Beauty only for non-color casters.

Note

Feet of hermes is more powerful in defense with a mono stack than this

MikeClough: I don't agree with this. Charm means attacks are 50% as effective (and counters). Swift gives your enemy -10 accuracy, or an average of -33.3% damage, vs charm with -50%. Also, alot of the units you would use for a blue mono stack already have swift. There would be some conditions where swift is better, for example, if you were trying to reduce enemy accuracy beyond 0.

Pi: Charm does not work against extra attacks, so Feet of Hermes is more reliable than Lovesick in a sense. And since units with powerful extra attacks (Red Dragons, Chimeras, Mind Rippers, Phoenixes, etc.) are encountered often, Feet of Hermes is generally more effective too.

MikeClough: Agreed. Feet of Hermes is better than Lovesick when dealing with units that have a powerful secondary attack, compared to their primary attack.

Psy: But is Feet of Hermes only for one stack?...

AstraLDeVa: somone got the description wrong - Lovesick is 1 random group also. Thus this spell and Feet of hermes are calculated on solo stacking only