|
|
| Line 9: |
Line 9: |
| | * Adds [[Charm]] and [[Beauty]] abilities to one random stack if {{blue}} on-color. | | * Adds [[Charm]] and [[Beauty]] abilities to one random stack if {{blue}} on-color. |
| | * [[Beauty]] only for non-color casters. | | * [[Beauty]] only for non-color casters. |
| − |
| |
| − | ==Note==
| |
| − | Feet of hermes is more powerful in defense with a mono stack than this
| |
| − |
| |
| − | MikeClough: I don't agree with this. Charm means attacks are 50% as effective (and counters). Swift gives your enemy -10 accuracy, or an average of -33.3% damage, vs charm with -50%. Also, alot of the units you would use
| |
| − | for a blue mono stack already have swift.
| |
| − | There would be some conditions where swift is better, for example, if you were trying to reduce enemy accuracy beyond 0.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Pi: Charm does not work against extra attacks, so Feet of Hermes is more reliable than Lovesick in a sense. And since units with powerful extra attacks ([[Red Dragon|Red Dragons]], [[Chimera|Chimeras]], [[Mind Ripper|Mind Rippers]], [[Phoenix|Phoenixes]], etc.) are encountered often, Feet of Hermes is generally more effective too.
| |
| − | [[Category:Spells]] [[Category:Phantasm Spells]] [[Category:Battle Spells]]
| |
| − | [[Category:Complex Spells]]
| |
| − |
| |
| − | MikeClough: Agreed. Feet of Hermes is better than Lovesick when dealing with units that have a powerful secondary attack, compared to their primary attack.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Psy: But is Feet of Hermes only for one stack?...
| |
| − |
| |
| − | AstraLDeVa: somone got the description wrong - Lovesick is 1 random group also. Thus this spell and Feet of hermes are calculated on solo stacking only
| |
Eradication | 
Verdant | 
Ascendant | 
Phantasm | 
Nether | 
Plain